Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts

Monday, December 24, 2012

2014 Corvette gets Closer and Closer!

 

What's New for 2014

The 2014 Chevrolet Corvette will be fully redesigned.

Introduction

The arrival of a redesigned Corvette is always an event, and the forthcoming debut of the seventh-generation model is no exception. Despite the inevitable hype, the 2014 Chevrolet Corvette will likely be a subtle evolution of a classic look. The "C7" will maintain its traditional proportions with a long, low nose and a high, stubby rear deck, but some chiseling has been done around the edges to tighten up the current model's already lean figure.
Despite an oft-rumored switch to a midengine layout (something that enthusiasts have speculated about since the 1970s), the C7 will certainly retain a front-engine configuration complemented by a

Saturday, December 15, 2012

The Jealous Haters , Matthew Johnson a liar And much more

Matthew Johnson stated on his blog that
"Rick Dyer has admitted the Tent hoax once" After speaking with Mr. Johnson several times a person would conclude he was a very upstanding honest person, Unfortunately I was wrong about his character. In a private conversation Mr. Johnson he begged me not to post any negative stories about the Sierra kills hoax. Because his buddy

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Posted by Robert Lindsay "New information about Rick Dyer’s Camper Bigfoot video"

New information about Rick Dyer’s Camper Bigfoot video. As I reported earlier, a BBC film crew was with Dyer when he shot a 3 minute video of a Bigfoot near San Antonio eating meat from a bait trap in a tree not 20 feet away from men in tents. Dyer was in one tent with

"I Support Melba" Derek Randles speaks the truth on Kutchum!





A friend and researcher asked me not very long ago which camp, IMO should he join, the Melba camp, or the anti Melba camp. I gave him the short answer, but I'd like to share the long answer here. As of late, the BF research community has become very divided, and both sides are very passionate about their cause, or side they've chosen. There are argue points that relate to what I'm about to

Rick Dyer will name his new boy "BIGFOOT"....Seriously

                               Dyer says baby is due any day and his name will be "BIGFOOT"!

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Update Sierra Kills Hoax update..Now out of desperation Justin and Tazer has a Bigfoot Body in the freezer!


      This is so sad a dieing Hoax trying to get reborn, So the Sierra Kills Hoax camp out
    of desperation "leaked"  this to Lindsay!


            Robert Lindsay  Wrote
Update on body recovery from the Sierra Kills. I and a couple of co-investigators continue to believe that bodies were recovered from the Sierra Kills. My reasons for believing that were posted in a

Thursday, December 6, 2012

We Told You ! Ketchum Paper Rejected......Again

                                                          We Told You!

 Ketchum paper has been rejected by peer review journals in the U.S. Before we give you the details, here's a statement from Steven Streufert of Coalition for Reason, Science, Sanity in Bigfoot Research:


It is official, then: The Ketchum paper was REJECTED and FAILED PEER REVIEW.

No conspiracy theory can change what this means: their science is NOT sound. It failed.

- Steven Streufert

Dr. Melba Ketchum's Bigfoot DNA paper has been rejected and that it will now be sent to a Russian review journal instead:


Yes, the paper of Dr Ketchum is under reviewing. And it is worth to be published. Just the situation now remindes me the war between North and South in the beginning of USA history... There are a lot of her supporters as well as a lot of her opponents and even some enemies...

The problem is that some people absolutize the science. Unfortunately science now is too conservative. One third of the population of the USA believes in BFs existing, but academic science even does not want to recognize the problem of their existing or not, just rejecting to dicuss this question. In such a condition this subject is under discussion of the broad public. We can't wait decades when scientists start to study this problem, forest people need to be protect now, not after half a sentury, when science wakes up.

Re the paper: the reviewed journals in the US refused to publish the paper. That is why Dr Ketchum has sent it to me to arrange publishing in any Russian reviewd journal. And I showed to our genetisits and understood that it was a serious work. I gave it up to the journal, now it's under reviewing.

Anyway, I informed public about the results of the study. The public waited for this info for more than a year, a lot of rumors were spreading around. And the public has the right to know it nevertheless "science" says about it.

- Igor Burtsev

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Linda Newton-Perry Says Bigfoot Body Has Been Found ...Smithsonian Institute Response.

Bigfoot Body, at least bones, may be in possession of the Smithsonian Institute! Information by Linda Newton-Perry of the online bigfoot magazine Bigfoot Ballyhoo


Smithsonian Institute Response by phone!! 12:42pm pst..."LOL... I can certify that
we never had a bigfoot body here, I don't think bigfoot even exists..lol

Rick Dyer on Mt. Charleston in NV

Dyer on Mt. Charleston outside of Las Vegas, NV, Says many bigfoot sightings have occurred
and he will get to the bottom of this! Bigfoot Tracker has been on a no kill mission since
the tent video on Sept 6, 2012. He will be focused on trying to communicate with one on camera.

Monday, December 3, 2012

A FaceBook Follower Donates $5000 To A Bigfoot Organization

Dyer posted a big thank you for the $5000 donation to his research. I guess he's not the most hated after all.

Here is a scanned photo from his cell!






Steve Kulls is STILL trying to ride the coattails of Dyer

This was emailed to us by a insider just now! The fact is Kulls will always try to ride
the coattails of Dyer anything he does has to involve Dyer. Dyer says "it's ok with him,
it just seems like Kulls can't live without me, I'm tired of protecting Kulls and then he
lies on me! He's sick and needs help and Steve Alcorn is another Team Tazer do-boy".
This is a conversation between Kulls and Alcorn.



Steve Alcorn  I would love to read the book someday! It was clear from the press conference that the Bigfoot autopsy was Biscardi's angle. He mentions it and claims he would invite "people of the boys choosing" to view the autopsy. Now Dyer is working up to something similar but what that is is yet to be discovered.
11 hours ago · 1

Steve Kulls I know what it is, Steve Alcorn and I threw a wrench into that as well.... what I got about a month ago will shut down any future for that as well. FB/FB ain't gonna be happy when I unload that bomb. Let's just say, it proves intent on Ricky's part. Dyer-LOL Drop the bomb...
      11 hours ago

Steve Alcorn I can guess where you are going with this and I bet it is the same thing as I am closing in on. I will anxiously await your bomb!
11 hours ago

Steve Kulls Let's just say, I have proof that his "production company was there" story is BS
Dyer-My Production Company was not there, That's crazy!

      11 hours ago

Steve Alcorn Ok, everything he says is BS, lol
11 hours ago · 1

Steve Alcorn Tricky Ricky and the Rickettes have been very busy behind the scenes trying to discredit other researchers lately as well.
11 hours ago

Steve Kulls I really pay no mind to him or the west coast horn honker anymore. It sidetracks me from real research. I mean it's beating a dead horse. However when Tricky Dyer tried the tent video, under an assumed name...well that needed to be called out on that...and thanks to you Steve for assisting greatly in that...great job!!! Dyer-LoL ..Steve you must pay some mind, because how many times
have you said you would never mention My name again. I see the gloves will have to come off!
I wanted people to find out it was me that's why I returned Kulls email with my same I.P address and used the "Riding my coattails" saying on a video!...lol it really took him to long to put everything together.
      11 hours ago · 1

Steve Alcorn  It sure did need to be called out! And your welcome,
11 hours ago

Rick Stancombe Dyer is just mentally deficient.
9 hours ago

                                        So now he's building up to bust a hoax........lol

                                    Dyer Says Shocking News TO Come about Mr. Kulls!

Merchant trying to strong-arm Face Bookers over Dyers videos

Merchant and the Team Tazer Thugs are at it again. Several reports of thuggish activity are coming in from all over. It seems like merchant is trying to strong arm people into not watching Dyers videos. Merchant wrote in one email "Don't support Dyer and his videos You're kicking team tazer In the teeth". Dyer stated "what Merchant doesn't realize he can't control everyone ,Only his sheep And now people are finally seeing through them and I am having more supporters than ever." It has also been reported to us that Merchant and Tazer has over 100 fake accounts from Facebook and YouTube.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Tim Fasano via his blog BigfootResearcher.com 2011

Taken From Face Book


This just in from Tim Fasano via his blog BigfootResearcher.com. According to Fasano, "two unrelated sources in the Bigfoot world" told him that the paper submitted by Dr. Melba Ketchum on the Bigfoot DNA study has been rejected.

After months of speculating whether or not the rumor about Dr. Melba Ketchum's Bigfoot DNA paper had been submitted to a peer review or not, Fasano was one of the skeptical voices during the whole ordeal. From the very beginning, there was word that it was originally Tom Biscardi who had his hand in this. "Biscardi was on to this scam months ago (just listen to his radio archives from May onward). They say it takes one to know one. You should have followed his lead. Now lets see who eats crow," Fasano wrote.

Even after breaking this news, Fasano maintains that Biscardi might have been hoodwinked again.
...
Great Job

"People in the BF world should have been more skeptical, and not have attached their wagons to this star. Where they hoodwinked? Was Biscardi hoodwinked?"

                                                                     Blog Post From last year!
 
 
Was Biscardi hoodwinked?"........Well all I can say on that is look at the videos! RD
 
 
 


Bigfoot is real! But DNA can't prove it with out a BODY! DEAD OR ALIVE


Bigfoot DNA   
by Steven Novella, Nov 26 2012
The Bigfoot community (yes, they still exist) is abuzz with the announcement that Bigfoot/Sasquatch DNA has been analyzed with interesting results. Bigfoot is the alleged large North American furry hominid that roams the deep forest, largely in the Pacific Northwest. It is known only from sightings and ambiguous trace evidence (blurry photographs, footprints, hair samples), but is most famous from the Patterson-Gimlin film (touted by believers, but highly criticized by skeptics).
After decades, however, what we lack is a physical specimen. No one has captured a bigfoot, killed one, found a dead body or skeleton. There is also no fossil evidence supporting the existence of such a creature. Researchers have found biological samples (such as hair or skin) that they claimed were from a bigfoot. The big news today is that a five-year study to sequence and analyze DNA from these samples has now concluded. I predict that the results will be touted by believers but highly criticized by skeptics.
The results have not yet been peer-reviewed or published, so there will definitely need to to be follow up when this occurs. The work was headed by Dr. Melba Ketchum, a geneticist working in Texas. Apparently she was scooped by a Russian collaborator, Igor Butsev, who released the results on his Facebook page. Ketchum was then forced to put out a press release confirming the findings. The press release indicates:
“Our study has sequenced 20 whole mitochondrial genomes and utilized next generation sequencing to obtain 3 whole nuclear genomes from purported Sasquatch samples. The genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA is a novel, unknown hominin related to Homo sapiens and other primate species. Our data indicate that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of males of an unknown hominin species crossing with female Homo sapiens.
Ketchum further indicates that this alleged hybridization occurred no more than 15,000 years ago. The press release also further clarifies:
“Sasquatch nuclear DNA is incredibly novel and not at all what we had expected. While it has human nuclear DNA within its genome, there are also distinctly non-human, non-archaic hominin, and non-ape sequences. We describe it as a mosaic of human and novel non-human sequence. Further study is needed and is ongoing to better characterize and understand Sasquatch nuclear DNA.”
Until these results are peer-reviewed and published it is difficult to give a definitive critique, but from what is being reported a few things are clear. First, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is unambiguously human. I suspect these samples come from hair, which retains mtDNA but not nuclear DNA (nuDNA). (Mitochondria are the energy factory of cells, likely evolved from primitive bacteria, and still retain some of their own DNA. Nuclear DNA comes from the nucleus of cells and is the main genetic code of the organism.)
The nuDNA also contains human sequences but also unknown sequences. We are told these do not match Neanderthal, other known early hominids, or any known ape. They are simply unknown. So, in short, we have human DNA (not human-like, but human) mixed in with some unknown sequences. Ketchum concludes from this that the samples are from a hybrid between a human and an unknown primate occurring less than 15,000 years ago.
Let me offer a preliminary alternate hypothesis. The hair samples that contain only human mtDNA are from a human. The samples from which the nuDNA is isolated are also from humans but with some contaminants or some other animal source mixed in. That seems to be a more parsimonious interpretation. I would like to know more about the source of the DNA, but I guess that will have to wait for the full details to be published. The fact that the human DNA is modern human (hence the need for the alleged hybridization to have occurred so recently in the past) is most easily explained as the source simply being modern humans.
Let us also consider the scenario that Ketchum is suggesting – in the very recent past (less than 15,000 years) an unknown primate bred with modern human females (mtDNA comes almost exclusively from the female line) producing the creature we now know as bigfoot. What, then, must the original unknown primate looked like? The result of this pairing then produced fertile offspring, enough to generate a new stable population of bigfeet. It is highly doubtful that the offspring of a creature that looks like bigfoot and a human would be fertile. They would almost certainly be as sterile as mules. Humans could not breed with our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees, or any living ape. It is probable that we could produce fertile young with Neanderthals, but it gets doubtful the further back in our evolutionary history we go – and how far back would we have to go to reach a common ancestor with bigfoot?
The bottom line is this – human DNA plus some anomalies or unknowns does not equal an impossible human-ape hybrid. It equals human DNA plus some anomalies.
Yet Ketchum (somewhat prematurely) suggests:
Government at all levels must recognize them as an indigenous people and immediately protect their human and Constitutional rights against those who would see in their physical and cultural differences a ‘license’ to hunt, trap, or kill them.”
What can be recognized is the process of pseudoscience – anomaly hunting and then backfilling to the desired conclusion. What we don’t have is compelling evidence for a new species.

 

FBFB Breaks Down Brown Thermal Bigfoot Footage in FL



After 2013 videos like this will be a thing of the past!

There is no reference sample of Bigfoot DNA to compare it with, so by definition, there cannot be a conclusive match.


Confirming it's Bigfoot How did the team definitively determine that the samples were from a Bigfoot? Did they take a blood or saliva sample from a living Bigfoot ? If so, how did they get that close, and why didn't they simply capture it or photograph it? If the samples were found in the wild, how do they know it wasn't left by another animal — or possibly even a hunter, hiker or camper who left human genetic material?
Previous alleged Bigfoot samples subjected to DNA analysis have been deemed "unknown" or "unidentified." However, "unknown" or "unidentified" results do not mean "Bigfoot." There are many reasons why a DNA sample might come back unknown, including that it was contaminated or too degraded by environmental conditions. Or it could simply mean that the animal it came from was not among the reference samples that the laboratory used for comparison. There is no reference sample of Bigfoot DNA to compare it with, so by definition, there cannot be a conclusive match.
Ketchum also issued a statement requesting that the U.S. government immediately recognize Bigfoot as "an indigenous people and immediately protect their human and Constitutional rights against those who would see in their physical and cultural differences a 'license' to hunt, trap, or kill them." Since no Bigfoot has ever been hunted, trapped or killed, it's not clear that the creatures — if they exist — require any special federal protection.
Ketchum's is not the only genetics-based project intended to find Bigfoot. Earlier this year, researchers from Oxford University and the Lausanne Museum of Zoology announced they were collecting samples of alleged Bigfoot and Yeti hair for genetic identification. Oxford geneticist Bryan Sykes collected materials from the public from May through September, and is currently conducting DNA analysis. Once the results are in, he plans to submit his results to a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
If Ketchum has the definitive proof she claims, the world will soon know about it, and Bigfoot will be proven once and for all. On the other hand, if the evidence never appears, or is inconclusive and flawed, the search will continue.

Benjamin Radford is deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer science magazine and author of six books, including Tracking the Chupacabra and Scientific Paranormal Investigation: How to Solve Unexplained Mysteries. His website is www.BenjaminRadford.com.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Hubbarton, VT, Man claims to have video of Bigfoot ravaging his apple orchard

Stay on your toes, Frisky readers in Vermont: a “self-described Sasquatch researcher” claims he has video of Bigfoot ravaging his apple orchard … on the same day scientists say that Bigfoot may actually exist. Spoooooky.
First, the alleged Bigfoot sighting in Vermont: Frank Siecienski of Hubbarton, VT, claims to have video of Bigfoot and its young scaring away a coyote in his apple orchard. Siecienski thought deers deer were eating all his apples, so he set up a videocamera to tape the orchard overnight. Instead of hungry deer, he claims his new video depicts a seven-foot-tall Bigfoot. (The Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife, party poopers that they are, say his video footage just looks like an owl. Which is also kinda true. I vote for a possible Bigfoot Hoax redux.)

But turns out Siecienski might not be totally crazy: a team of researchers has just put forth a study, currently under peer review, claiming that Bigfoot might really exist. “Extensive DNA sequencing suggests that the legendary Sasquatch is a human relative that arose approximately 15,000 years ago as a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens with an unknown primate species,” according to a press release from the researchers (who are not affiliated with any institute of higher learning).

You can read all the blah blah blah details about Bigfoot DNA, but the crux of the issue is this: BIGFOOT IS COMING TO EAT YOU.

bigfoot