Taxon, Genus, Species, Classification? What
should Hank, the sasquatch that Rick Dyer provided to the science community, be
named?
By Jason Judd Team Tracker Member
This is a very interesting question that I can imagine that many of you
would like to know. While we just call him Hank for now, and probably forever,
science must categorize this creature within the Darwinian flow of life from a
common ancestor. How does the genus classification begin you ask?
The science
of morphology, biological systematics, and molecular phylogenetics (data from DNA sequences).
What the “H” are those? Just trust me. The last two stated systems have revised many genus
classifications in the last decade within both homologous and analogous types.
The problem: Hank is a new species. So what DNA do we compare him with in
order to correctly classify him? First, since he is bipedal, he will be
compared to Homo sapien and Homo sapien sapien. Next is the comparison of
Neanderthal and his genome. Finally, the comparison of primate genes from
gorilla down to lemur. Then the morphology of ancestrial bipeds will be
compared with Hank’s skeleton and skeletal structure. This takes time…..lots of
time……and it’s nothing more than just coming up with a name on paper.
FoxP2 Gene is a very important gene that separates sapien from the rest
of the primates. This gene is also found in Neander, thus giving him the
ability to speak or communicate. If Hank has a version of this gene that is
similar to ours or Neanderthal and has at least one more amino acid strand longer
than a chimps FP2 gene, then Hank should be classified as Homo or a type of
Australiopith. Another gene that will
separate Hank from lower primates is the srGAP2 gene, which is only duplicated
in humans and other bipedal ancestors.
This gene gives hominids and humans the
ability to think quickly, reason, deduce, and react accountably. Depending on the length of this gene and Hank’s
morphology, this will define his genus classification as Homo or Austrliopith.
Next is the species name. This is what separates sapien from erectus,
erectus from heidelburgensis, denisovian from Neanderthal, and Habilis from rudolfensis—each
all from us. Normally, this is location of discovery, discoverers name, a
specific trait or the combination of the three. This is where it gets fun….
Location: America, Texas, Bexar County, San Antonio.
Discoverer: Rick Dyer
Traits: Bipedal, Hairy, Large, Muscular
Many species
names are associated with Latin language.
America =
Americus
Hairy = pilo
Large =
gigas
Dyer = Dy
So what
would be a reasonable name for Hank, the North American sasquatch?
Homo Dygigapilo-Americus?
Or
Australiopethicus
Dygigapilo-Americus?
Those are
definitely mouthfuls aren’t they. I for one will continue to use Hank unless specifically
asked for a genus name; or, the current fad of “squatch” is fun, as easily
rolls off the tongue.
After creating a stir last October with preliminary results, an international research team has published an analysis of dozens of hair samples from mystery animals around the world. None reveal the existence of a yeti Bryan Sykes, an Oxford University geneticist well-known for his research on human evolution. But two hair samples point to a possible new and (you guessed it) mysterious species: a bear roaming the Himalayas that may be related to ancient polar bears.
