Revisiting the Smeja/Cutino/ Bigfoot Evidence/Sahebi Hoax and Flesh Sample Hoax

All this is a known fact around the Bigfoot Community, But when you conceder the community is full of cowards and want expose people because they don't want to get black balled;. 

Fact: Shawn Evidence, Justin Smeja and Ro Sahebi concocted this Hoax 

Fact: Shawn Evidence, Justin Smeja and Ro Sahebi all new each other and was good friends before Justin claims.

Fact: Shawn Evidence started Bigfoot Evidence to support their hoax!

Fact: Rick Dyer said the sample of meat would come back as bear months before it did.

Fact: Ro Sahebi was close friends with the polygraph examiner. 

Fact: Justin Smeja submitted a piece of flesh he
claimed was recovered from the area where he shot an adult and an infant Bigfoot to the Ketchum DNA Study. (Sample 26)

Fact: Bart Cutino befriended Justin Smeja.

Fact: Cutino/Smeja submitted flesh sample(s) they claim came from the same piece of recovered flesh that was sent to the Ketchum DNA Study to Trent University Lab and DNA Solutions Lab for DNA testing.

Fact: The Ketchum DNA Study reports that Sample 26 is from a Bigfoot and a full genome was extracted.

Fact: The Cutino/Smeja flesh sample(s) were tested at two different labs - Trent Univeristy and DNA Solutions of Oklahoma City OK. The results of the Cutino/Smeja flesh sample(s) came back Black Bear with human contamination.

Fact: Cutino/Smeja used these reports to launch an attack on the Ketchum DNA Study and claim that Dr. Ketchum was" hoaxing" or "making up results" since it is their assertion that all the flesh came from the same larger piece of flesh.



Fact: DNA Solutions reports the Haplotype of the sample they tested for Cutino/Smeja isT2.

Fact: Trent University reports the Haplotype of the sample they tested for Cutino/Smeja isA.

Fact: The Ketchum DNA Study reports the Haplotype of Sample 26 (Justin Smeja Sample) is H1a.

Fact: It is IMPOSSIBLE for the flesh samples to be from the same subject!

Fact: The sample submitted by Justin Smeja to the Ketchum DNA Project IS NOT from the same piece(s) of flesh submitted to Trent or DNA Solutions labratories.

Fact: The Haplotype results from the Ketchum DNA Study for Sample 26 came from an independent university lab - University of Texas, Southwestern in Dallas, TX..

Fact: The DNA tested from Sample 26 was uncontaminated and from a single source.  (See Attachment 1 at the bottom of this blog for details)



Fact: Bart Cutino claims Trent University made a mistake in reporting the Haplotype of the sample as A.

Here is his quote "With respect to the discrepancies in hablotypes from our labs, we believe it’s pretty clear (though double-checking) that the type A mention is an error, because if you read the report they never mention “A” (which is Native American) they only discuss a “European” hablotype. Justin must be T2 because Oklahoma got both mtDNA & nDNA from him from their testing on both the salted and frozen pieces."

Interesting, since he has claimed the Ketchum DNA Project is flawed and full of errors then tries to admit his lab made a mistake and use that as an excuse for the discrepancies in the Haplotypes?



Below are the actual excerpts from the Cutino/Smeja Lab Reports and the Ketchum DNA Study demonstrating that the Haplotypes DO NOT MATCH.

Below are the flesh samples side by side, I will let  you be the judge.

 

In the end what the flesh looks like does not matter. It is the DNA testing and the Haplotypes that prove that the samples are not related and not from the same subject.

Bottom line Bart Cutino befriended a man that openly admitted to shooting, in cold blood, a Bigfoot adult and then shooting a defenseless infant Bigfoot. In my opinion this calls into question Bart's judgement and integrity.

For what ever reason, Cutino, Smeja, et al have attacked and attempted to mislead the public by testing Bear flesh and claiming it was from the same piece of flesh that was in the DNA study.
Even the DNA studies Cutino commissioned prove that he his hoaxing but he relies on the ignorance of the general public concerning DNA testing to get away with it.

I am not backing down and I am not going to let the critics bandy about their accusations, insults, claims, and personal slurs without a challenge. A challenge that is based on documented FACTS!





Attachment 1 - Excerpt from the Ketchum DNA Study

The run summary generated by the HiSeq 2000 next generation sequencer provides scores, Q30, for run quality​78​. Q30 can also be used to determine if there was any contamination (or mixture) found in the samples sequenced.  According to Illumina, a pure, single source sample would have an Q30 score of 80 or greater with an average of 85. However, if there was contamination present in the sample sequenced, the divergent sequences would compete against one another prior to sequencing causing a contaminated sample to have a Q30 score of 40 to 50.   The Q30 scores for the three genomes sequenced had Q30 scores of 88.6, 88.4 and 88.7 respectively for samples 26, 31 and 140.  The Q30 is the percent of the reads that have the statistical probability greater than 1:1000 of being correctly sequenced. Therefore, not only were the sequences from a single source, but the quality of the sequences were far above the average genome sequenced using the Illumina next generation sequencing platform. The high quality of the genomes can be attributed to the stringent extraction procedures utilized whereby the DNA was repeatedly purified.   This ultra-purified DNA also allowed for greater than 30X coverage of the three genomes.  The summary and of the next generation sequencing generated by the HiSeq 2000 Illumina sequencer is furnished as Supplementary Data 7-10.

      You cant make this shit up people! Sanh's last attempt to BS people about the failed 
Justin Semja Bear-Meat Bigfoot Hoax! 

1st Story-  Its a peace of bigfoot! The meat came back as bear!
2nd Story- It was contaminated by a bear...A bear chewed on it!
3rd Story- IT WAS A BEAR-MUTATION its not a Bigfoot!     
4th Story- Rick Dyer hoaxed us and gave us bear -meat!....More to come!!!
    

                                    CHECK THIS BULL-SHIT STORY OUT BELOW!!!!
                                       Taken from Smeja's Hoax Partner Sanh Evidence

As you surely know if you have been following your bigfoot news, avid hunter Justin Smeja claimed to have shot 2 "Bigfoot" at Northern California in 2010. If you haven't heard this story yet, please do some searching and researching on the Bigfoot Evidenceblog, or watch this for an interview (Link). To me, Smeja seemed like he wasn't lying. He seemed like a no nonsense guy and he started putting time and money into looking for Bigfoot after the encounter. He never made any money from his claims. He also had the driver of the truck that they were in collaborate the story, and passed the polygraph test (although polygraphs can be faked, but not easily). But, in my opinion, if you haven't been following this story since the beginning then you likely don't believe it. But here is a nice article by Tyler Higgins on why he believes Smeja: 

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Sierra Kills: Bigfoot or Bear Mutations?

Editor’s Note: This is a guest post by Jay of the Bizarre Zoology blog. For info on weird and amazing facts/theories of zoology, paleontology, and cryptozoology go tobizarrezoology.blogspot.com or follow him onTwitter.

As you surely know if you have been following your bigfoot news, avid hunter Justin Smeja claimed to have shot 2 "Bigfoot" at Northern California in 2010. If you haven't heard this story yet, please do some searching and researching on the Bigfoot Evidence blog, or watch this for an interview (Link). To me, Smeja seemed like he wasn't lying. He seemed like a no nonsense guy and he started putting time and money into looking for Bigfoot after the encounter. He never made any money from his claims. He also had the driver of the truck that they were in collaborate the story, and passed the polygraph test (although polygraphs can be faked, but not easily). But, in my opinion, if you haven't been following this story since the beginning then you likely don't believe it. But here is a nice article by Tyler Higgins on why he believes Smeja: (Link)

Justin Smeja looking like a boss, with a black bear

If you believe the story, it is likely that you think Justin shot two Bigfoot (plural form in Bigfoot, not Bigfoots). He allegedly shot an adult and then later a juvenile. However, Justin's first claim was different. This is the exact post that Smeja made on Taxidermy.net:

Post by: Smeja on November 07, 2010, 01:24:27 AM

Call BS if you want but this bear season I saw a bear in Northern California that walked on 2 legs and was pale white in color like a pale yote (coyote) sorta. Like some grizzlys I’ve seen but whiter. It stood 8 feet tall or so and walked like a man. Could have been a grizzly (highly doubtful). I don’t know for sure what it was. Maybe just a monster black bear that got shot in the front leg years back and learned to walk different. I don’t know. I do know I was not alone when I saw it.

I shot it with a 25-06 behind the shoulder at 120 yards. It ran 70 yards into the brush and crashed. Sounded like a car wreck. I never found it. Not saying it was bigfoot at all – it just looked different from any bear I’d seen. If it looked any more human-like, I would have passed on it. Something wasn’t right there, oh and it was prob 600+ lbs or more. So to answer my question, I suppose the answer is probably yes for me, but not if he looked any more human then what I shot.

Sample possibly belonging to the animals that Smeja killed

To me, this is interesting. This is the original Sierra Kills report, before he had contacted Bigfoot researchers and was told that he had shot unknown bipedal primates. This is where my theory starts. While researching early reports of the event by Smeja, the description of "weird bears" kept coming up. One question in the polygraph report stated "did the strange animals you shot in the Sierra Kills incident look like a large man in a bear suit," and Justin's answer was yes (with no deception indicated). So could Justin have really shot a very odd bear that had deformations or genetic mutations? My theory may have DNA evidence to back it up.

DNA results of sample

Another sample from the piece of skin that Justin found.

On December 26 of 2012, the DNA results of a piece of skin, allegedly belonging to the animals that Justin shot, was revealed. Bart Cutino and Tyler Higgins sent this sample to Dr. Bradley White (Canada Research Chair in Genetics) for DNA analysis. It was unknown whether this was a sample from one of the "Bigfoot" that Justin killed, as Justin found the sample when he returned to the site weeks after the event. However, according to Justin, the hair color and other characteristics of the sample matched those of the animal that he shot. The results indicated that the sample's main contributor was Ursus americanus, a black bear, with some DNA contamination by Justin. So the sample was not from an unidentified hominoid, but rather, a black bear. It's possible that Justin could have found this sample from a black bear at the site, and that the different Bigfoot samples were decomposed or eaten. But, in my opinion, this result makes perfect sense.

My theory is that what Justin shot were actually black bears with natural genetic mutations or deformation. Mutations, although rare, can truly make an animal look or act differently. To make it clear, I am not saying that the animals that Justin shot were lab experiments. I am theorizing that they were the result of natural mutations. Mutations can be handed down to an animal's descendants, thus explaining the juveniles that were also reported. But how could a mutation or deformation turn a black bear into a Bigfoot like creature? The transformation from black bear to a Bigfoot like creature may seem too bizarre to be true, but it's possible. First of all, keep in mind that Justin never referred to the animals as Bigfoot before people had told him that the animals he described sounds like one. In my opinion, the Bigfoot attribution was by Bigfoot researchers and enthusiasts and not by Justin himself. He was troubled by what he had seen and did not know what to attribute the animals to, until people had approached him saying that he had shot Bigfoot. So add to this a fear inducing and fast paced encounter with bipedal standing animals, and you get a Bigfoot shooting story.

An intriguing, but very rare result, of natural mutations is that sometimes an animal can have features that prehistoric relatives had. This is known as an atavistic trait. Example of this include the dolphin found with four flippers, the chicken embryos with archosaur like teeth, and the breed of dogs that are being bred to look like Dire Wolves.

Oh, the dreaded red circle. But we aren't circling a blob-squatch, at least.

A prehistoric relative of bears had features that, if duplicated by a genetic mutation, could produce an black bear that looks similar to the animal that Justin shot. This bear is known as Arctodus, or more commonly the 'short faced bear', and lived throughout North America 11,000 years ago. This bear was a true giant, and claw marks reaching up to 15 feet on the walls of caves have been found! But the characteristic that associates it with the possible mutant bear shot by Justin Smeja, is its short and almost flat face. Unlike modern bears, Arctodus had a short (almost like a bulldog) face and long legs. There have been comparisons made between Arctodus and primates. It has been called the 'monkey-faced bear' by some, and its posture (as it had front legs longer than the hind) has been likened to that of a gorilla. So if a mutation resulted in a black bear with a body shaped like an Arctodus, then it could explain the Smeja encounter. However, it is very likely that this was not a case of an atavistic trait and was simply a regular deformation.