Response to Don Boucher ass kissing attempt

Yes folks Don Boucher is attempting to get in to the good graces of the Bigfoot Community by kicking other people down by given the popular opinion. Don hasn't been in the woods in decades but he does know how to bash people and lie. As you see in this video Don will not go after – the people that needs to be bashed, Like Shawn Evidence Justin Smeja oh no you can't do that, instead he goes after people that actually been in the woods looking for Bigfoot and sharing their evidence. It's really easy to sit behind a computer and talk shit. It's hard to get off your fat ass and go in the woods and actually do something to help in the search of Bigfoot. All these keyboard hunters are doing is hurting what's left of the real Bigfoot community. The real Bigfoot community are those people who don't post very much ,who don't bash people no matter what ,Who concentrate on what they're doing and not what someone else is doing or have not done. Don has bashed me for over a year lying and making up wild stories about me posting pictures of my house .He was even kicked off of other Bigfoot forums for being too aggressive and that's very unusual. I left I forget about Don boucher video with him talking with Philip. The video will be back up on the private site with a link very soon.

Don Doucher a lonely sick cunt... He has to be to come up

"DNA Dilemma"

 

 

If you have been following this story, you know that a science blogger named Eric Berger released information stating that "a highly reputable geneticist" friend of his in Texas had looked into Dr. Melba Ketchum's data claiming that it was "a mix of opossum and other species." Ketchum posted a response to all this on you Facebook page (Below)

In response to the latest round of criticism. 1. We did give these folks access to the genomes. 2. They only pulled random sequences and did not look at the whole genomes. The person from UT that did our analysis told me that he never got all of the raw data uploaded to the second lab due to computer problems on the receiving lab's end. 2. I offered raw DNA to this lab so they could extract and sequence themselves. They would not even give the courtesy of a reply. 3. They refused to even speak with me on the phone. The entire thing was completely and totally unprofessional. 4. They never tried to check the analysis done at the University of Texas even though the bioinformatics person put himself at their disposal.

 What findings they gave were impossible since both of our labs would have had to extract feces to obtain these results. If it had been feces, we would not have been able to obtain the preliminary results that we got prior to the genomes. After all, they were the same extractions. You can't get feces from tissue, blood and saliva. If we did extract feces, the quality scores would not have been this high. That is in the literature. This leads to a couple of possibilities. One, there is a conspiracy to suppress our findings. Two, they just didn't care and didn't believe that there is even the possibility that Sasquatch exists and therefore just wanted to be done with it because they had other projects. Three, they themselves suppressed it for fear that their careers would be damaged. The things that I know for sure are that it was not an adequate analysis, they did not even try to double check or recreate our findings. If they really had an interest, they would have jumped at the chance to resequence the raw samples. Funny thing, I offered the samples to three other places also and nobody was willing to test. Something is just not right. I also offered several people an opportunity to visit a habituation site including this reporter and his lab people so they could have a sighting. Of course they didn't want that either. Bottom line, nobody except a few of you here even care about the truth. Most would rather perpetuate that BF is a myth or an ape.