Bigfoot is real ... maybe.
After months of waiting for a peer-reviewed scientific journal to publish findings on the validity of alleged Bigfoot DNA evidence, the time has come for answers. But is there enough empirical evidence to finally confirm that the elusive, tall, hairy man-beast of North America really exists? Maybe, but questions have now been raised about the scientific journal publishing the findings.
In November, after a five-year study of purported Bigfoot (aka Sasquatch) DNA samples, Texas geneticist Melba Ketchum and a team of experts in genetics, forensics, imaging and pathology, were anxious for their findings to be published in a scientific journal. On Wednesday, their research appeared in the DeNovo Journal of Science, which seemed to confirm Ketchum's research about the reality of Bigfoot.
But according to GoDaddy.com, DeNovo was first registered
as a domain on Feb. 4, 2013 --- anonymously and for only one year.
The current edition of DeNovo is listed as Volume 1, Issue 1, and its only content, thus far, is the Bigfoot research.
Also, on Ketchum's Sasquatch Genome Project website, she writes, "It has been a long and tedious battle to prove that Sasquatch exists. ... Trying to publish has taken almost two years. It seems mainstream science just can't seem to tolerate something controversial, especially from a group of primarily forensic scientists and not 'famous academians' aligned with large universities, even though most of our sequencing and analysis was performed at just such facilities."
Ketchum then explains how one journal agreed to publish her findings, but then was advised not to by its lawyers because such a controversial subject "would destroy the editors' reputations (as it has already done to mine). ... Rather than spend another five years just trying to find a journal to publish and hoping that decent, open minded reviewers would be chosen, we acquired the rights to this journal and renamed it so we would not lose the passing peer reviews that are expected by the public and the scientific community."
And therein lies the potential problem: Did Ketchum "buy" this journal, and begin its new existence under the name of DeNovo just over a week ago in order to get what appears to be a favorable peer review of her Bigfoot studies? That's the big question being raised by numerous people at this point.
According to a press release by Ketchum's Sasquatch Genome Project, the study, "which sequenced three whole Sasquatch nuclear genomes, shows that the legendary Sasquatch is extant in North America and is a human relative that arose approximately 13,000 years ago and is hypothesized to be a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens with a novel primate species."
A total of 111 specimens of alleged Sasquatch hair, blood, skin and other tissues formed the basis of the study. These samples came from many individuals and groups at sites covering 14 states and two Canadian provinces.
4 comments:
Being a fence sitter I reserve judgement on anything related to bigfoot evidence. Mention was made this month the Melbrum better get going to beat Mr. Dyer to the finish line. It appears that she did but just like the claim of Rick Dyer she is being beaten up by the bigfoot community. You can please some of the people some of the time but you can not please all of the people all of the time.
I think that Dr. Ketchum had inside information that you really do have a body and so she knew that she could not wait any longer to publish. I certainly do not blame her. Imagine a whole team of scientists working hard for 5 years to get this study to peer-review, only to have it utterly overshadowed (and almost inconsequential) when someone produces a body? This way their work will stand as seminal, and you, Rick Dyer, will cast the final, incontestable blow to mainstream science that Sasquatch does indeed exist. Let's hope that they will then be a protected species and not a single one will heretofore be harmed. One can only hope, right?
Ketchum came up with some new ways to extract DNA from hair so it will be interesting to see how her results compare to Ricks Sasquatch DNA. Ricks could confirm her new techniques and give her a big boost in her field.
Stop with the protection nonsence. They have been doing just fine without outside interference from humans. If Rick has indeed killed one it is only because it became habituated by the homeless people. I only mention this because of the so called habituators within the bigfoot community. This will have to be outlawed and nothing else related to bigfoot.
Post a Comment