Unfortunately for Derek Randles I am starting to call out back door support.
These are people that support you but don't want anyone to know about it. They are cowards in my book and I will not tolerate it anymore.
Things are going to change very quickly!
25 comments:
Wow Ricky, very nicely written, only one error.
Well one gramattical error anyway, "This proves that anyone in the bigfoot community can be a part of HOAX". You need to say "a HOAX".
The only other error is in your thinking. In your mind if you say it's a hoax, anyone who stands behind it is a hoaxer, and your word constitutes proof.
You are delusional.
First of all Rick, it could be a hoax, it probably is a HOAX, but there is not enough evidence to prove without a reasonable doubt that it is a hoax. Fortunately, or unfortunately depending on your point of view, there is not enough evidence to prove it is a true story either.
It's my understanding Derek obtained some pretty compelling evidence when he went back to the location. I haven't seen this, have you? I can't say he is a hoaxer, but he could be. I can, along with everybody else on this earth say that you are a hoaxer, because of your past, but even that doesn't prove you still are.
I agree, and it's not like Randles position has changed. It's been the same since the beginning. I don't get it Rick. Are you saying you have just learned of this? I doubt Randles is knowingly going along with a hoax. If it is a hoax I'm pretty sure it is just a case of him falling for the story. You know that there were many honest people duped by you in '08.
I hope for your sake you do have a body. If you don't, I think the amount of hate you have seen so far will seem miniscule to what you will see.
I don't think Derek is being secretive or deceitful. There just isn't much actual proof- it was hoped that they could get DNA evidence. Just because he isn't vocal about, doesn't mean he is hiding something. He is never going to bang the drum for something inconclusive.
I agree with you 100% hoax!
The problem is Rick doesn't kiss ass. He tells it like it is.
Rick is telling it like he thinks it is, not as it actually is.
His opinions are fine, but stating things like this as facts will come back to bite him.
Without proof, it's libel.
What school teacher comes on a blog site and corrects gramattical errors? Dude, get a life!
What was the compelling evidence Anon? Supposed blobs on a therm? Any heavily forested mountainous area is probably going to support Bigfoots. One doesn't hunt bears in the city (or in bear boy's case, poach). So to say there may be other Bigfoots in the area is really clinging onto a thread there.
Someone's got to correct the abhorrent spelling of this redneck dipshit, if you don't like it, hum on my nuts!!
Who the hell is Derek Randles?
You have another large problem - far bigger than any grammatical error. The photo used in this article about Derek Randalls is not Derek Randalls.
He doesn't have to kiss ass but he should want to get his facts right. Just sayin.
Rick enjoys the hate.
The proof is all around! Dummy
So far the type of hate he has seen could more accurately be described as a type of attention.
Kick up a few ticks.
I'm not exactly sure Rick thinks straight. He is kind of erratic. One day praise Fasano, the next he bashes him. It's the same think with Randles.
Again, more unfounded bullshit. Derek has never hidden his involvement with Smeja. You claim to be this man's friend then stab him in the back with lies. Who exactly is the coward in this scenario? Rick Dyer's version of the truth means the exact opposite of everyone else in the world. If Rick treats his friends like this then he is a huge ass and should be treated that way. If Rick lies about his own friend then it would not be a stretch to imagine that he is lying to all of us ((but we already knew that, didn't we).
Oh, and by the way, thanks for changing the photo to the correct person. Some friend you are of Derek's, don't even know what he looks like. The dude you had in the original photo even had his name on his hat and you missed it. Some Tracker you are, LOL.
Yes yes, thermal footage is what I understand, not sure if they are "blobs" or not, none the less considering it was in the same area, it IS compelling circumstantial evidence that if nothing else lends to the possibility that a story that is IMPOSSIBLE to prove as true (since no bodies) is at the very least plausible.
FACT: Short of the parties involved admitting it is a hoax, it cannot be proven to be a hoax & since there is no body, it also cannot be proven to be true. We are left with a story plain & simple. Rick saying it is a hoax is not and will never be proof either.
It's time for Rick to man up and let the Sierra Kills STORY go. It has no more creadance than the Twilight Saga.
Quit being a pussy Rick, a real man wouldn't even mention it, for some reason it really has your panties in a bunch.
I see you finally realized you had Tim Stover's photo up. You really need to pay attention Rick. You don't seem to know anybody in the Bigfoot world and you can't even describe what a dead Bigfoot looks like. According to you, it was right there at your feet.
Give up blogging.
Whos to say they weren't people out in the woods showing up on a therm? This is all a joke and I'm done with it. HOAX
Sometimes I wish he would give up breathing
It's possible it is people on the thermal footage, I haven't seen it so cannot say one way or another. Even if I had seen the footage it's possible it could not be determined human or not......... It is a story. It is not a hoax (for sure) it is not true (for sure).
Everyone should be done with it, including, and most importantly Rick Dyer. There is nothing to prove except his own story.
I'm quite confident if Rick were to see a psychologist, he would be diagnosed with several objective clinical findings, perhaps Bi-polar, and/or pathological liar.
I like the pathological liar!
All you wish for Rick God will multiply for you...
Post a Comment